Analysis of Series "Breaking Bad".


The literary comparisons, though, get even loftier. What started as a darkly comic crime show deepened into a drama commonly referred to as Shakespearean, with White often compared to Macbeth. The Shakespearean analogy is only a little overblown - because in terms of what Western culture is producing at the moment Breaking Bad is among the very best. The novel may still be the pinnacle of that culture - but a show like Breaking Bad comes thrillingly close to challenging its supremacy. If even 20% of television was like Breaking Bad then - God forbid - the novel might have to step into second place among the art forms which best express and analyse the spirit of the age.
The show ended in a crescendo of fan hysteria, media hype, five-star critical adoration and ratings studio chiefs would open a vein for. Breaking Bad almost single-handedly put Netflix, the online movie and TV streaming channel, on the map. Its finale was a watershed for television and a masterclass is what TV can do as an artform. We are not talking about "who shot JR" here, or Den and Angie getting divorced in the Vic on Christmas Day. We are talking about a type of television that is trying to be almost Dickensian. In fact, forget trying - it is Dickensian. This is writing that takes powerful, believable characters, places them in a contemporary, realistic setting and allows their lives to play out over a long period of time in order to deconstruct our society and entertain and excite the viewer. The wonderful trick of Breaking Bad is that we experience moral fury at our anti-hero’s particular philosophy, wishing for its abdication — and with this judgment, we viewers become nearly like pre-modern moralists. This is a different kind of moral fury than The Wire, which risks bleeding into fatalism: there, individuals have little recourse against the destructiveness of institutions. Here, the destruction is caused by man’s hand. The other lesson is the importance of supporting characters for spice. Breaking Bad would not have been as rich without Mike Ehrmantraut, Gustavo Fring, and of course Saul Goodman. Hill makes a strong argument and you should , but I disagree that capitalism is the core of Breaking Bad. For me, the constant visual evocations of Westerns and action flicks point a different direction: gender panic. Walter gave up on his startup only to get stuck teaching bored teenagers the basics while his former partners earn billions pushing the boundaries of the science he loves. He’s so ill-compensated he takes a carwash job that inverts the status his education would seem to confer, and spends his evenings getting yelled at by strangers picky about their cars. In our multi-channel world of endless choice, many readers might not have seen Breaking Bad, but they will certainly have heard of it - if only from mates obsessing in the office. So here's a brief catch-up: five years ago the American cable channel AMC commissioned what seemed to be a quirky crime drama about a brow-beaten high-school chemistry teacher called Walter White who discovers he has cancer and hooks up with a druggie ex-pupil to cook the drug Crystal Meth to pay for his chemo and leave a little cash behind for his hard-working, solidly middle-class, respectable but put-upon family. Come last Monday, and five seasons in, Walter White had descended to sulphurous depths of evil, his family and everyone who came within his orbit destroyed by his ambition, pride and ruthlessness. As I read Therese’s accolades about Breaking Bad (which I haven’t seen yet), I thought that all her words could be applied to the series Justified. The amazing thing about that series is that those characters are so well drawn you find yourself rooting for Boyd (the bad guy) as much as you do for Raylan (the good guy). This was also true for the True Detective series. Thanks Therese for an interesting post. I think most writers recognise good character building, whether it is in books or films.

("An Analysis of Walter White in Breaking Bad.")

It would be almost a year before I returned to Breaking Bad on Netflix. Not quite bingeing. Almost. It was like riding an unsaddled horse – all you could do was hang on and see where he was taking you. By this time, I was well into the rough draft of my own first novel. TV had become a welcome relief from adjusting to life alone, but I couldn’t help but feel Jim was there with me loving every bizarre minute of the story telling in BB. I also paid close attention to the dance of devices in plot and character as they played out. There was a writing lesson in every episode.

He’s the main character from the hit show Breaking Bad on Netflix.

If The Wire descends from Aeschylus’s Oresteia and its cycle of never-ending violence and despair that humans cannot transcend without intervention from the gods, then Breaking Bad — in its philosophy of the origin of evil, in its human-centered narrative — most directly traces to John Milton’s Paradise Lost.

BREAKING BAD, created by , introduced us to many great characters.

Breaking Bad is not alone in showcasing complex, three-dimensional characters, whom the reader and audience is unsure of whether to love or hate (why do we root for Medea’s escape even after she has killed her children?). All of the major protagonists in The Sopranos, The Wire, and Mad Men are admirable in some way but have some deeply rooted character flaw, are all dealing with some reversal of fortune and struggle with larger forces of destiny, fate, or God.

An Essay on Liberation: Breaking Bad - Notes - e-flux

Breaking Bad appears, at first, to ask the age-old question posed by the Book of Job: why do good people suffer — why must Walt, mild-mannered family man, be struck with a debilitating illness and forced to illegality because of a broken health-care system? But the show soon inverts Job’s question, asking instead: why do bad people flourish? What moral universe produces, and then propels, a man like Walt?

Series Breaking Bad - 645 Words | Essay Example - IvyPanda

I was excited to rewatch “Breaking Bad” because every time I have rewatched the show, I have seen and learned new things about the show, the way it creates a nuanced and complex narrative, and how the writers infuse foreshadowing and strong character development from the very first moments of the show.