Essay on why college athletes should get paid
The first point is even though college athletes have the same hours as a full-time job, athletes should not be paid because it would take money away from other activities. If athletes get paid $100,000 for every football player, there are usually 20 - 30 players per team. $2,000,000 to $3,000,000 goes to the football team yearly. If so much money goes to the football team, how much money does that leave for other activities? “If we pay the athletes maybe we should also do it for the first violinist in the school orchestra, or the lead actor in the theatrical productions, and perhaps popular professors allocate course enrollment slots to those students who bid the highest,” Andrew Zimbalist, sports writer.
If college athletes got paid for competing in sports, they would learn how to manage their money. Money management is one of the most important young people can learn. It is a big factor of making a living and succeeding. This would be very good to learn because if the athlete goes into the pros, they could have a good idea what to do with their money. Also, this would help the athletes how to save. A big part of money management is saving the money you earn. Many young people don't know how to do this because either they don't have enough money to create savings or they don't see the importance of saving. If the college athletes were paid, they would be able to mater these skills and have an advantage in adulthood. College Athletes: Should college athletes be paid? College Athletes should get paid because when they don't get paid it pushes them to go to the big leagues and they end up making the mistake of forgetting that they also have education that they have to do. On why they should get paid, the mistakes that athletes are making, colleges taking advantage of college athletes, and there can be bad outcome but there can be good that comes with it. Although college athletes don't get paid right now, they should because then they will be selling things in college that can get them in trouble or fall behind with homework assignments. I personlly think NCAA athletes should get paid, because they put a lot on the line to play college ball. Yea they might get paid in free education but you got to look on the other side how are they to support they self for personal needs like tooth paste, cloths, shoes, soap, and many more. What about the ones that go out of there home state and play. Their family many miles away so they can’t get to much support from them. So many people would say why bother to argue this topic? Because there are several reasons that need to be considered. College athletes should get paid because they risk a lot. They risk the rest of their lives to entertain and make it a living, but they can get hurt at any time. It could be an injury that could ruin the rest of their lives. Summary: This article argues against my previous sources by saying that the only the high-market, high-revenue universities are able to pay their players if at all. Many of the universities in America however are operating their programs at a cost to the university. Mitchell reiterates the fact that student-athletes are not at the university just to play their sport but they are there to become educated adults as well. He says that, “college athletics are a vehicle for receiving an education” by this he means that athletics should only help an athlete receive their education instead of hurt it. In the end it is the student’s choice to pursue athletics and they run the risk of whatever comes from it. Mitchell does note that the NCAA is discussing a raise in financial aid for student athletes that mirrors the funds of working full-time students at the same institution. These athletes should get paid as if it is their job since they devote the same amount of time towards it as they would a job. The fact that scholarships do not cover all expenses for every athlete is one reason why college athletes should get
Should College Athletes Be Paid Essay With Arguments
There are many different ways to earn money. In the article “Should College Athletes be Paid,” both Joe Nocera and Bob Williams have very different opinions. Although these athletes bring in money for the school, college athletes should not be paid because being paid could prevent other students from participating in college sports and it could take their attention away from academics. Many people love to purchase items for their favorite college team or college player. When purchasing these items, the school is given money, as Joe Nocera states,”...
Should College Athletes Be Paid Essay With Arguments
In conclusion, college athletes should get paid due to that fact that they have no time for jobs, profiting money will help build of money management skills, and get them ready for adult hood. If college athletes got a salary for being involved in sports that would dramatically change the young peoples' lives for the better.
Should College Athletes Be Paid Essay With Arguments
One compelling reason why college athletes should not be paid is because college athletes are often given scholarships. Some people may be aware enough to realize that student athletes on athletic scholarships are already being paid. According to the author of Forbes, Pay College Athletes , it states, “Certainly not all student athletes are on scholarships and not all are on full scholarships but the student athletes in the revenue sports are receiving compensation in the form of educational benefits and living expenses.” This evidence means that college athletes on athletic scholarships already receive many paid expenses. Free tuition, room, meal plans and money for books and extra expenses are some things that are covered by athletic scholarships.
. (2023) 'Should College Athletes Be Paid or Not'. 5 March.
Success in college sports is believed to improve the application rates and caliber of admitted students at certain universities. When Boston College quarterback Doug Flutie won the Heisman trophy, Boston college's undergraduate admissions went up by 25 points and its average SAT score of admitted freshmen increased by 110 points. College sports add a reputation to the school, and a good reputation obviously makes a difference. This reputation can even draw non-athletes. Many colleges use their athletes as core marketers of the university. For example, if it wasn’t for basketball players, Gonzaga University would need to spend a lot more money on building a name recognition to students not located on the West. Everyone has their own opinion, but mine is that college athletes should be paid. The amount of time they put into their sport, the amount of money everyone else is making off of them, and their overall importance to the school are only three of a myriad of reasons why they should be paid. These athletes are not only students, but employees to their universities. They are a core member of many university’s marketing team. They do not play a sport of leisure, and therefore should be